Philosophy
Home ] Christianity ] Logic ] Politics ]

 

Home
Photo Album
Philosophy
Work
Copyright
Resume
Links
Glossary

My current philosophy includes several aspects:

politics: I'm an anarcho-libertarian. I consider initiation of aggression against a man or his property (which doesn't include only violence, but also theft and deceit, and it also includes *threats* to initiate violence) to be morally bad. I don't think that one should never initiate aggression - there might be cases in which something more important is at stake. But one should always accept the consequences. [Aggression in retaliation is ok.] Favorite site: David Friedman's. Oh, I also oppose to government-granted monopolies, including copyright and patents.
economics: I admire the Austrian school. I consider that values are subjective. Favorite site: The Mises Institute.
religion: I'm a Christian. I believe the Bible to be the Word of God (fundamentalist). I believe the Earth (and the whole Universe for that matter) to be no older than 10,000 years (young-Earth creationist). Favorite site: True Origins.

 

Important things I've learnt in philosophy:

Words (symbols), concepts and things are not the same. From a point of view, this is obvious - and yet, people keep confusing words with concepts and things.
Words point to (represent) concepts, with the exception of proper nouns, which point directly to things.
Concepts are either complex (refer to other concepts) imaginary (refer to nothing in reality, like the concept of an Unicorn), or refer to things. Concepts don't exist outside a mind, whether the mind is human, animal - or God's.
Every system of knowledge (which is what "philosophy" basically means) must start from certain assumptions. Many Christian philosophers make the mistake of accepting atheists' assumptions - and then try to prove the existence of God starting from materialistic premises. Don't. You have the same right to your assumptions that the atheist has to his.
Alvin Plantinga has a great article about this - Advice to Christian Philosophers. [I'll post a link to it when I find it.]

Observations about Objectivism:

When I first heard about Objectivism, I liked it. Objectivism is the philosophy of Ayn Rand (this had the side effect of making me think that - finally! - there are some intelligent women! <g> Too bad it disappointed me in the end...) - you can find lots of information about it on the net. Politically, it is a subset of libertarianism.

Unfortunately, the extreme absurdity of some of their views (like atheism) made me dislike it. Furthermore, the cult mentality of (most of) its members hasn't helped a bit.

This is an example (copied from the ayn_rand list at www.onelist.com):

From: Jessica DeButts <jdebutts@uclink4.berkeley.edu>

I was on onelist and looking for other Rand/Objectivism lists to join, and I joined the "Objectivism" list, which requires  list owner approval. I got an email from the list owner and in it there was the following paragraph:

>2. One does not have to agree with Ayn Rand on everything (or even
>whole parts of her philosophy) in order to join the 'Objectivism'
>list. But, NO ONE is allowed to be on this list that supports or
>sanctions any of Ayn Rand's and Objectivism's enemies!  This means
>that no one is allowed on the 'Objectivism' list that supports or
>sanctions: those who in print have attacked Ayn Rand and her
>philosophy; "moral tolerationists"; "moral agnostics"; libertarians;
>anarchists; etc. (If you are uncertain of whether or not you support
>or sanction someone that makes you disqualified from joining this
>list, then write an e-mail and explain the situation to:
>*****@post.com)

Does this seem odd to anyone else? I knew there was a cultlike mentality
amongst many objectivists, but I didn't know it was this bad. It really
makes me wonder why they exclude people; what they are afraid of. I
mean, if Rand/Objectivism is as sound as all the devotees preach, then
why not open the lists to discussion? I'm trying to learn here, and
policies such as these are in no way conducive to either learning or
making Objectivism a main stream philosophy. I'm beginning to understand
where Mr. Jones is coming from. I guess that in itself is reason for my
disqualification. :)

Jessica

[Dick Jones is the moderator of the list, a vocal anti-Objectivist.]

This page was last updated on 13 Oct 1999.